User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Amazon Otter Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonOtter Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.4tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2AmazonOttercloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Blink Android 4.4.2AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.14001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:34 | by ThaDafinser