User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; HTC D820us Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.109 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.4unknown HTCD820usMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.4HTCD820usMobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.4.4HTCD816tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.4HTCD820ussmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.4.4HTCD820uscloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.4.4HTCDesire 820mobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:34 | by ThaDafinser