User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; xx; LG-D227 Build/KOT49I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
LG Browser Android 4.4.2Blink 537.36LGL50mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.13401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD227mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4LGD227smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD227closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.103WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGD227closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser Blink Android 4.4.2LGL50mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.103closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LGD227Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:34 | by ThaDafinser