User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50215; baiduspider)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
baiduspider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesbaiduspiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Baidu Crawler Bot Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:34 | by ThaDafinser