User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.7; xx; HTC Desire) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.3.324 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.2Android 2.3.7Gecko HTCDesiremobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCA810emobile-browseryescloseclose0.28803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Android 2.3HTCDesiresmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.3closeAndroid 2.3.7HTCDesirecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324 Linux HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Android 2.3.7HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3HTCDesireSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:33 | by ThaDafinser