User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2; zh-cn; IdeaTab S2010A-D Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoIdeaTab S2010A-D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.2GenericAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.38404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.2LenovoIdeaTab S2010Atabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.2closeAndroid 3.2LenovoIdeaTab S2010A-Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.13Android 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.2LenovoIdeaTab S2010tabletyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.07301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:33 | by ThaDafinser