User agent detail

Austin Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.0.4 Release/05.07.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/534.30 Android 4.0.1;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-381.php
Android 4.0Android 4.0unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4Austinmobile-browseryescloseclose0.29103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.20002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4Austinmobile:smartyescloseclose0.082 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:33 | by ThaDafinser