User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T259/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/4.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
NetFront 4.1 NetFront SamsungSGH-T259smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-T259 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront SamsungSGH-T259smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.1close SamsungSGH-T259closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.26503 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 SamsungSGH-T259mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:32 | by ThaDafinser