User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD) KHTML/4.9.1 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.9FreeBSD KHTML 4.9.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.9closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.9KHTML FreeBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.9closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.9closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.9closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.9 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9.1FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:32 | by ThaDafinser