User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv6l) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/25.0.1349.2 Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/538.1 Debian/7.2 (3.8.2+rpi-2rpi1) Epiphany/3.8.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.8.2Debian 7.2Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 25.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian 7.2desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.8.2closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.8.2WebKit 538.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.8.2Webkit 538.1Debian 7.2desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:31 | by ThaDafinser