User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win3.11; en-US; rv:21.56.11.90) Gecko/20500230 Firefox/3.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 3.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Windows desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5Gecko 20500230Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5Gecko 21.56.11Windows desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:31 | by ThaDafinser