User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.85 Safari/537.36 OPR/32.0.1948.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 32.0OS X El Capitan 10.11Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 45.0Blink MacOSX 10.11AppleMacintoshDesktop0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 32.0.1948.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 32.0.1948.25closeOS X 10.11.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 32.0Blink Mac 10.11desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 32.0.1948.25closeOS X 10.11.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 32.0.1948closeMac OS X 10.11.0closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeOS X 10.11.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 32.0.1948.25WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 32.0Blink OS X El Capitan 10.11desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 32.0.1948.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:30 | by ThaDafinser