User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F01A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoF01A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMoF-01Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoF01Afeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF01Acloseclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
F01Acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FujitsuF01Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F01Acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoF-01AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:30 | by ThaDafinser