User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux i686; HbbTV/1.1.1 (+PVR+DRM; BANGOLUFSEN; A3; ; ; ) CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/4.3.9) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50 A3/1.0.5.32855 (BANGOLUFSEN, A3, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407Bang & OlufsenA3 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux BangOlufsenBeoVisiontv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50 A3/1.0.5.32855 (BANGOLUFSEN, A3, wired)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux BANGOLUFSENA3closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 Bang & OlufsenA3 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:29 | by ThaDafinser