User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-cn; T8620 Build/HuaweiT8620; 320*480) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiT8620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.0HuaweiT8620smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 4.0.3HuaweiT8620closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94WebKit 528.5Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose2.28523 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 4.0.3HuaweiAscend Y200Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:28 | by ThaDafinser