User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Origyn Web Browser; U; AmigaOS 4.0; xx) AppleWebKit/534.0 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/534.0) OWB/3.32
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Origyn AmigaOS 4.0Webkit 534.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.08401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OWB closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit AmigaOS 4.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeAmigaOS 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.29603 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Origyn Webkit 534.0AmigaOS 4.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:28 | by ThaDafinser