User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; C7 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.124 YaBrowser/14.10.2062.12160.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 14.10Android 4.1unknown CubotC7Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.10Blink Android 4.1CubotC7Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.124closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.10.2062.12160.01closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.10Blink Android 4.1yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.10.2062.12160.01closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.10.2062closeAndroid 4.1.1ZopoC7closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.10.2062.12160.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.10Blink Android 4.0.4C7tabletyescloseclose0.082 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.124closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.11501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:28 | by ThaDafinser