User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; MSIECrawler; Windows 95)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
MSIECrawler 4.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 4.0Trident Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.0closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMSIECrawlerclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.14402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:27 | by ThaDafinser