User agent detail

com.sdgtl.watch.flyer/2.1.2120412326.191140 (build:201191140; model:HTC Flyer; device:flyer; mcc:262; mnc:07; modeLite:true; fp:tmo_de/htc_flyer/flyer:3.2.1/HTK75C/205068.1:user/release-keys; cid:T-MOB101; appId:com.sdgtl.watch.flyer_hc)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCFlyer Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
com closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCFlyermobile-browseryescloseclose0.20702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCFlyersmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCFlyercloseclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCFlyermobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:26 | by ThaDafinser