User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Large Screen Safari/534.24 GoogleTV/b61925
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 11Google TV Webkit 534.24television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux GoogleGoogleTVTV Device0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit Google TV GoogleGoogleTVtvyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeGoogleTV GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77WebKit 534.24Google TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Google TV televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 LogitechRevueSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:26 | by ThaDafinser