User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/2012314 Firefox/17.0.1 Slackware Linux
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 17.0.1Slackware Gecko 11.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 17.0Gecko 17.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.08101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 17.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 17.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 17.0Gecko Slackware desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 17.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 17.0.1closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 17.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 17.0.1Gecko 2012314Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 17.0.1Gecko 11.0Slackware desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 17.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:25 | by ThaDafinser