User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A328t Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.133 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 44.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA328tMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328tMobile Phoneyesyes0.06101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 44.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328tcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.133WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:25 | by ThaDafinser