User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-cn; GT-I9228 Build JZO54K) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9228 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGT-I9228smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-I9228closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:24 | by ThaDafinser