User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
yes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Bot MobileBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGooglebot-Mobile/2.1close0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebot-Mobileclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0.5closeiPhone OS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot Mobile 2.1WebKit 532.9 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebot Mobileclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebot Mobileclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:24 | by ThaDafinser