User agent detail

MobileKeeper/BASIC/1033/ms_wm6professional/01.06.2718.0001 WindowsMobile6/Windows Mobile 6 Professional/HTC/HTC Touch Pro2 T7373/5.2.21884.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch Pro2 T7373 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MobileKeeper BASICcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows Mobile 6HTCTouch Pro 2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows Mobile HTCTouch Pro2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch Pro2 T7373closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Mobile HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows Mobile 6HTCTouch Pro 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:24 | by ThaDafinser