User agent detail

Orca-Android/2.2.5-release OS/4.0.4 Model/Lenovo_A390_ROW VersionCode/108531 Product/Messenger Carrier/o2_-_de Manufacturer/LENOVO Brand/Lenovo
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA390_ROW Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Orca-Android 2.2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2.5LenovoA390mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LenovoA390 ROWsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.2.5LenovoA390_ROWcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Orca Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.2.5LenovoA390mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.11301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:23 | by ThaDafinser