User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Crazy Browser 2.0.0 Beta 1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Crazy Browser 2.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Crazy Browser 2.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Crazy Browser 2.0.0 Beta 1closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Crazy Browser 2.0.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Crazy Browser 2.0.0 Beta 1closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:22 | by ThaDafinser