User agent detail

iHeartRadio/430 CFNetwork/485.12.30 Darwin/10.4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0iOS 4.2unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 4.2AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iHeartRadio 430closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 4.2.8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 485.12.30closeiOS 4Applecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iOS 4.2.8mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.2closeiOS 4.2AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:22 | by ThaDafinser