User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.73.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.1.1 Safari/537.73.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Safari 6.1MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.1WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.1.1closeOS X 10.8.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.1WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.1.1closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.1.1closeMac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.1.1closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.1.1WebKit 537.73.11Mac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.1.1Webkit 537.73.11OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.1.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.8.4Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:22 | by ThaDafinser