User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT; U; xx) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Iris/1.1.8 Safari/525.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-iris.yaml
Iris 1.1.8Windows Mobile Webkit 525.18.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 3.1.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 3.1WebKit Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1.1closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.1.8closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 1.1.8closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.1.8WebKit 525.18.1Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iris 1.1.8Webkit 525.18.1Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.1.1closeWindows NT Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:21 | by ThaDafinser