User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.10 Chromium/15.0.874.121 Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chromium 15.0.874.121Ubuntu 11.10Webkit 535.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 15.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.12101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 15.0.874.121closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 15.0WebKit Ubuntu 11.10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 15.0.874closeUbuntu 11.10closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 15.0.874.121WebKit 535.2Linux 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 15.0.874.121Webkit 535.2Ubuntu 11.10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:20 | by ThaDafinser