User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 Midori/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Midori 0.4NetBSD Webkit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 2.0 Desktop0.07301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0.1closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko NetBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.4closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.05001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.4Gecko 20100101a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.4Webkit NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:20 | by ThaDafinser