User agent detail

LG-KG200J
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKG200J Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-KG200J closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGKG200Jmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGKG200Jsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGKG200Jcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGKG200Jcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGKG200Jmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGKG200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:20 | by ThaDafinser