User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A859 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 43.0Android 4.2unknown LenovoA859Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA859Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA859mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA859smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA859closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoA859mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA859Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:19 | by ThaDafinser