User agent detail

MOT-T720M/AS_G_05.06.20R MIB/2.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaT720M Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 MotorolaT720MMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-T720M AScloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaT720Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaT720Msmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaT720Mcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 MotorolaT720Mmobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaT720MFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:19 | by ThaDafinser