User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Series 60; Opera Mini/7.1.32453/36.1817; U; uk) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 7.1SymbianOS unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.1Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32453closeSymbian OS OperaOpera Mini for S60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto Symbian OS Series 60 yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32453close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32453closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32453Presto 2.12.423Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.1Presto 2.12.423Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 7.1close OperaMini 7Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:19 | by ThaDafinser