User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; GoogleToolbar 7.5.5111.1712; Windows XP 5.1; MSIE 8.0.6001.18702)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesGoogle ToolbarBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle ToolbarBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0.6001.18702closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0.6001.18702closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.14601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0.6.001 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:18 | by ThaDafinser