User agent detail

AcerTD600_TD/1.0 Android/2.2 (Linux; Android 2.2) Release/12.20.2010 Browser/WAP 2.0 AppleWebKit/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.2Webkit 530.17AcerbeTouch TD600mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2AcerbeTouch TD600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2AcerLIBRAsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 530.17Android 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.2AcerbeTouch TD600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:18 | by ThaDafinser