User agent detail

SonyEricssonW580i/R8BE Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
SEMC 0.0SymbianOS unknownunknown SonyEricssonW580iMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonW580iMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW580i R8BEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonW580imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonW580ifeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonW580icloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W580icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonW580imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonW580iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:17 | by ThaDafinser