User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; zh-cn; HTC Raider 4G with Beats Audio Build/GRJ22) UC AppleWebKit/530+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCRaider 4G with Beats Audio Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCX710emobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCRaider 4G with Beats Audiosmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCRaider 4G with Beats Audiocloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 530Android 2.3.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 530Android 2.3.4HTCRaider 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:16 | by ThaDafinser