User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2; en-gb) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/2.0.5932M Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 2.0Android 3.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 2.0WebKit Android 3.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 2.0.5932closeAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 2.0WebKit Android 3.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 2.0.5932closeAndroid 3.2Tabletcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 2.0.5932MWebKit 534.35 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 2.0Webkit 534.35Android 3.2tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:15 | by ThaDafinser