User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT- S5250/ S5250VJKC1; U; Bada/1.0; pt- br) AppleWebKit/ 533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile WQVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 profile/ MIDP-2.1 configuration/ CLDC-1.1 OPN- B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-samsung-bada.yaml
Dolfin 2.0Bada 1.0Webkit SamsungWave 525mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.10501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-S5250mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 Bada 1.0SamsungSAMSUNG-GTsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit Bada 1.0SamsungWave 525mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:14 | by ThaDafinser