User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD i386) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
Chrome 36.0OpenBSD unknownunknown 537.36unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink OpenBSD Desktop0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink OpenBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125WebKit 537.36OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:14 | by ThaDafinser