User agent detail

Nokia6350/2.0(ATT.12.40) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Nokia6350/12.40; Mozilla/5.0 (Profi
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Nokia6350mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia6350 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia6350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia6350smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0(ATT.12.40)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6350closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia6350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6350Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:13 | by ThaDafinser