User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-us ; LG-E405 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.4.1.204/145/35
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE405 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.4WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.4WebKit Android 2.3LGE405smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.1closeAndroid 2.3.6LGE405closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.25302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.4.1.204WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6LGLGE405closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.4Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6LGOptimus L3 Dualmobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3LGE405Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:12 | by ThaDafinser