User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1403.0 Safari/537.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 26.0.1403.0Windows 7WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.14001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1403.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1403.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1403.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1403closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1403.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1403.0WebKit 537.30Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1403.0Webkit 537.30Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1403.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:12 | by ThaDafinser