User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/0vodafone810/B626 Browser/Obigo-browser/Q05A MMS/Obigo-MMS/Q05A SyncML/HW-SyncML/1.0 Java/HWJA/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiVodafone 810 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM Huaweiv810mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close HuaweiVodafone 810closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile 0vodafone810closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Huaweiv810Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:12 | by ThaDafinser