User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (NOKIAE90)UC AppleWebkit(like Gecko) Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser Series60 Gecko NokiaE90 Communicatormobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.06301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSeries60 NokiaE90 Communicatormobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian NokiaE90smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 530closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close NokiaE90closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Series60 NokiaE90 Communicatormobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:12 | by ThaDafinser