User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A536 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.135 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 36.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA536Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA536Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA536mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 36.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA536smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA536closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.135WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA536mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA536Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:12 | by ThaDafinser