User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; HTC S720t 16GB Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Oupeng/8.2.0.63948 Mobile Safari/534.30 (securitypay)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCS720t 16GB Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCS720emobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1HTCS720t 16GBsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCS720t 16GBcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Oupeng 8.2Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1HTCOne XTmobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:11 | by ThaDafinser